In New Hampshire, a real estate attachment can be an important legal mechanism that allows a party in a lawsuit to secure a lien on a piece of real property, ensuring that the property cannot be transferred or sold before the resolution of the case. It plays an essential role in protecting a plaintiff’s potential judgment by preserving the status quo during litigation. In this article, we will take a look into the process of real estate attachments in New Hampshire, exploring their purpose, how and when they are granted, and what both plaintiffs and defendants can expect throughout the process.
Purpose of a Real Estate Attachment in New Hampshire
The primary purpose of a real estate attachment is to provide plaintiffs with a means to secure their legal rights in a dispute over real estate or a dispute involving a claim for money damages. Essentially, the attachment serves as a lien on real property, ensuring that the land or property involved in the lawsuit cannot be sold, transferred, or otherwise disposed of by the defendant before the final court judgment is made. This ensures that the plaintiff’s potential rights or judgment are protected.
For example, in a lawsuit over ownership interest in real estate, an attachment ensures that the property will remain under the jurisdiction of the court and available for transfer to the plaintiff if the plaintiff prevails in the lawsuit. In cases where the plaintiff is seeking money damages (such as for breach of contract, personal injury, or debt collection), the attachment ensures that the defendant’s property remains available to satisfy the judgment in case the plaintiff wins the case.
The attachment is especially important when there is concern that the defendant may attempt to hide, sell, or transfer the property to avoid the outcome of the lawsuit. In such cases, an attachment provides a safeguard that prevents the defendant from making any moves that would render the plaintiff’s eventual judgment ineffectual.
When Is a Real Estate Attachment Granted?
The rules governing the granting of a real estate attachment in New Hampshire are guided by both statute and case law. Generally, a plaintiff cannot request an attachment until after they have obtained a judgment from the court. This means that the plaintiff must first initiate a lawsuit, present evidence to the court, and receive a favorable decision before they can pursue the attachment of the defendant’s property.
However, there are significant exceptions to this general rule. New Hampshire law allows for the possibility of a prejudgment attachment. This means that a plaintiff may attach the defendant's property before the final judgment in a case is reached, ensuring that the defendant does not have the opportunity to transfer or hide the property until the case is decided.
Prejudgment Attachment
Under New Hampshire law, a prejudgment attachment is typically granted in cases where the plaintiff can show that there is a real and imminent risk of the defendant moving or transferring the property before the court can render its final decision. The purpose of prejudgment attachments is to prevent any actions by the defendant that could frustrate the plaintiff's ability to collect on a potential judgment. There are two main ways a prejudgment attachment can be filed in New Hampshire:
With Notice: In this scenario, the plaintiff files a Petition to Attach with Notice, and the defendant is given an opportunity to respond to the request for attachment before the court takes action. This is the standard process for obtaining an attachment, and it ensures that due process is followed, giving the defendant a chance to contest the attachment.
Without Notice: In some circumstances, the plaintiff can request a prejudgment attachment without notifying the defendant in advance. This is typically done in emergency situations where immediate action is necessary to prevent the defendant from transferring or hiding the property. In these cases, the plaintiff must convince the court that notifying the defendant would risk the property being disposed of before the court can intervene.
One common example of a prejudgment attachment is a mechanic’s lien. Contractors, subcontractors, or material suppliers who have provided services or goods for a construction project, but have not been paid, can file a mechanic's lien against the property before a judgment is entered in the case. This lien is tied directly to the property and can be filed at the start of a lawsuit, allowing the plaintiff to attach the property without waiting for a final judgment.
General Requirements for Prejudgment Attachments in New Hampshire
The statutory framework for prejudgment attachments in New Hampshire is primarily governed by RSA 511-A. Under this statute, a party seeking an attachment must apply to the court and provide notice to the opposing party. This was not always the case. Prior to 1973, New Hampshire law provided broader rights for plaintiffs to obtain a prejudgment attachment without the same due process protections that are required today under RSA 511-A. In fact, before that time, plaintiffs co
uld obtain an attachment as a matter of right, even in equity cases. See Sindt v. Gilfoyle, 124 N.H. 315, 317 (1983). RSA 498:16 provided that "[t]he plaintiff in a bill of equity . . . shall have a writ of attachment . . . as of right . . . to secure the performance of any decree or order that may be in the suit." Sindt v. Gilfoyle, 124 N.H. 315, 318 (1983). In 1973, the New Hampshire's legislature passed RSA 511-A to ensure that plaintiffs could only obtain prejudgment attachments after following specific procedures. In Gilfoyle, the New Hampshire Supreme held that the "as of right" language in RSA 498:16, as applied to pre-judgment attachments, was repealed in 1973 because of the statutory due process requirements of RSA chapter 511-A.
Key Features of RSA 511-A
Notice and Preliminary Hearing: RSA 511-A mandates that the defendant must be given notice of the request for a prejudgment attachment and be provided an opportunity for a preliminary hearing.
Emergency Exceptions: In emergency situations where immediate action is required, the court can approve a prejudgment attachment without the defendant’s notice.
The Role of RSA 511-A in Real Estate Attachments
RSA 511-A is the statute that governs the process for obtaining an attachment in New Hampshire. This statute outlines the procedures, requirements, and standards that must be followed when requesting an attachment of real property, whether before or after judgment.
The key provisions of RSA 511-A include:
RSA 511-A:1: This provision requires that the defendant be notified and given an opportunity for a preliminary hearing before a prejudgment attachment is issued, except in cases where emergency action is necessary.
Court’s Power to Grant Attachment Without Notice
While the general procedure under RSA 511-A requires notice and a hearing, there are exceptions to this rule. RSA 511-A:8 allows the court to grant an attachment without prior notice to the defendant in exceptional circumstances. This power is typically reserved for situations where there is a substantial risk that the defendant will transfer or hide the property, and immediate action is necessary.
The Mechanics of Ex Parte Attachments
Ex parte attachments refer to situations where the plaintiff requests an attachment without notifying the defendant first. RSA 511-A:8 outlines specific conditions under which such attachments may be granted, and typically, they are used in emergency situations, such as when a defendant is about to sell or transfer the property in question. One key aspect of an ex parte attachment is the requirement that the plaintiff present a compelling argument that immediate attachment is necessary to preserve the property before it can be transferred to a third party.
Lis Pendens: Notice of a Pending Lawsuit
One tool for plaintiffs involved in real estate disputes is the lis pendens. It can be found under RSA 511-A:8,III. While a lis pendens is not an attachment itself, it serves as a notice that a lawsuit has been filed concerning a particular piece of real property. The filing of a lis pendens provides notice to third parties (such as prospective buyers) that there is a pending legal action that may affect the property. This is particularly important because, under RSA 511-A:5, a real estate attachment is not effective against bona fide purchasers (i.e., buyers acting in good faith) until it is recorded in the registry of deeds. The lis pendens ensures that third parties cannot claim to have acquired the property free of any liens without being aware of the pending litigation.
Limitations of Ex Parte Attachments and Lis Pendens
Ex parte attachments are powerful but come with strict limitations. A lis pendens, while useful in preventing third-party buyers from acquiring the property without notice of the legal dispute, cannot independently perfect an attachment. The court's approval is still required for an attachment to be effective.
Legislative Intent and Judicial Oversight
The New Hampshire legislature's intent in enacting RSA 511-A was to strike a balance between the rights of plaintiffs to secure their judgments and the constitutional due process rights of defendants. As such, any ex parte attachment or lis pendens must comply with the law's procedural safeguards to avoid unfairly prejudicing the defendant.
Conclusion
Real estate attachments in New Hampshire are a powerful legal tool that plaintiffs can use to protect their interests in property disputes. Whether through prejudgment attachments or post-judgment liens, this process ensures that a plaintiff’s potential judgment is not rendered meaningless by the defendant’s actions. However, the procedure is complex, and both plaintiffs and defendants must navigate a range of statutory requirements and judicial discretion to ensure their rights are protected.
Understanding the detailed provisions of RSA 511-A, the role of lis pendens, and the criteria for obtaining prejudgment or ex parte attachments is crucial for anyone involved in real estate litigation in New Hampshire. By following the proper legal steps and respecting the due process requirements, parties can effectively use the attachment process to secure their claims while ensuring fairness in the litigation process.
Comments